THIS IS NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE. Kairos Signal is not a broker-dealer, investment advisor, or financial services provider. This is a machine learning research product — a geometric expression of a rough approximation of the market’s hyper-dimensional phase space, from which α (statistical excess signal) can be mapped and extracted. “Alpha” refers exclusively to the mathematical α coefficient in regression residuals, not guaranteed returns. Built by independent ML researchers. All outputs are for research and informational purposes only.

Verifiable DePIN Data · 457 Live Symbols (328 Networks + 129 Subnets)

DePIN Intelligence — verifiable supply data with a receipt on every number.

Kairos Signal is a verifiable DePIN data layer. We carry live telemetry for 457 symbols328 DePIN networks plus 129 Bittensor subnets as separate series — 297 of the networks first-party, read from the project's own endpoint or chain — out of 800 networks cataloged. That is 10,642 live series updating continuously (measured 2026-08-30). Every value ships with its source, an as_of timestamp, and a verify_url pointing to the upstream you can check yourself right now. Each daily batch is Merkle-rooted and anchored to Bitcoin. In a world drowning in AI slop and made-up numbers, we bring receipts.

457 DePIN Networks Tracked
11,061 Provenance-Stamped Live Series
800 Networks Cataloged
100% Values With A verify_url
Design Partner Brief — published weekly

Raw feeds are the input. The brief is the judgment: which networks are building capacity faster than demand absorbs it, whose published dashboard has quietly stopped updating, how much of each token's reported supply we can independently confirm on-chain, and where exchange balances just moved. Every line carries its source, its as-of time and a link to check it yourself.

This is how we caught Akash's own API serving 30.5% GPU utilisation while the measured figure was 55.8%. Read the latest brief →

API access is granted on approval. Every value carries its source + as_of + a verify_url to the upstream; each daily batch is Merkle-rooted and anchored to Bitcoin via OpenTimestamps.

Upstream Sources: First-Party Network APIs CoinGecko DefiLlama GitHub Dev Activity Bitcoin / OpenTimestamps

Every value carries a receipt

The DePIN data surface is provenance-stamped values across 457 symbols — 328 networks plus 129 subnets — with live data (as of 2026-08-27), and every single one ships with its source, an as_of timestamp, and a verify_url to the upstream that produced it. Don't take our word for any number — click through and check it at the source.

Live row · AKT · verifiable now
{
  "symbol":     "AKT",
  "metric":     "circulating_supply",
  "value":      383502056.718427,
  "unit":       "tokens",
  "source":     "CoinGecko /coins/markets",
  "verify_url": "coingecko.com/en/coins/akash-network",
  "as_of":      "2026-08-09T17:15:20Z"
}

Open the verify_url and read Akash's circulating supply at the source. If it doesn't match, we're wrong — and you'll know in one click. That is the entire product philosophy: irresistible because it's checkable.

source

The exact upstream endpoint behind the value — CoinGecko /coins/markets, DefiLlama /overview/fees, or a network's own API. No blended, un-attributable aggregates.

verify_url

A live link to that upstream so you can confirm the number yourself this second. 100% of the 11,061 live series carry one.

as_of

The timestamp the value was read — staleness is on the record, not hidden. 10,057 of 10,641 live series were refreshed in the last 24 hours (measured 2026-08-27).

no gaps papered over

Where a network publishes no free feed, we name it in the coverage map instead of inventing a number.

Bitcoin-anchored provenance

The verify_url proves each number is real at the source. The Bitcoin anchor proves we didn't quietly change it afterward. Every value in today's batch is hashed into a Merkle tree; the root is submitted to 4 independent OpenTimestamps calendars and anchored to the Bitcoin blockchain. Once the timestamp confirms, the exact contents of the day's dataset are pinned to a point in Bitcoin's history that no one — including us — can backdate. A public per-value inclusion-proof endpoint ships with the API.

merkle_root: 9cd92fde04…987318b7  ·  values: full day batch  ·  calendars: 4  ·  anchor: Bitcoin / OpenTimestamps

Not one number per network — dozens

Beyond market and revenue facts, 296 networks carry first-party telemetry read straight from each project's own API and chain (3,773 first-party series, measured 2026-08-27): node counts, committed CPU/GPU, storage, leases, staking, coverage. Here is the live metric breadth, measured from ClickHouse on 2026-08-26.

Live Metric Depth — Per Network measured 2026-08-22
NetworkSymbolCategoryLive Metrics
MysteriumMSNVPN / Bandwidth
24
AkashAKTCloud Compute
19
io.netIOGPU Compute
19
ThreeFoldTFTCompute / Storage
18
StorjSTORJStorage
15
WeatherXMWXMWeather Sensors
14
TitanTITANStorage / CDN
13
GrassGRASSBandwidth / Data
12
Aleph.imALEPHCompute / Storage
12
FluxFLUXCompute
11
GolemGLMCompute
10
ChirpCHIRPWireless / IoT
10
GeodnetGEODGNSS / Positioning
9
RoamROAMWireless / WiFi
9
LivepeerLPTVideo Transcoding
8
FilecoinFILStorage
7
HeliumHNTWireless
7
AethirATHGPU Compute
7

…and more networks in the deep-telemetry layer. Every metric is read from the network's own API/chain and carries its own source and timestamp. Sample metrics for Akash: ACTIVE_CPU, ACTIVE_GPU, ACTIVE_STORAGE, ACTIVE_LEASES, BONDED_TOKENS, STAKING_APR, REV_24H.

800
Networks Cataloged (incl. not-covered map)
457
Networks With Live Provenance-Stamped Values
296
Networks With First-Party / Chain-Direct Telemetry

Coverage is a map, not a marketing number. 800 networks are cataloged (as of 2026-08-26), including the ones we don't yet cover — where a project publishes no free feed, the catalog says so rather than filling the gap with a guess.

DePIN Telemetry, Right Now

Coverage measured live from ClickHouse on 2026-08-27 — 457 symbols with data in the trailing 7 days (328 networks + 129 Bittensor subnets).

457 Networks Tracked
🗄️ 11,061 Provenance-Stamped Live Series
🔬 296 First-Party Networks / Chain Feeds
100% Values With a verify_url

How Data Becomes Signals

Raw market data, public records, and blockchain telemetry are processed through the 63-layer ByteDAG to produce statistical signals.

Step 1

Data Ingestion

Continuous collection of market ticks, weather data, energy grid status, county assessor filings, and DePIN blockchain telemetry.

Step 2

Feature Extraction

Raw data is normalized and embedded into high-dimensional feature vectors — market-state, network telemetry, and regime descriptors, computed causally with no look-ahead.

Step 3

63-Layer Forward Pass

The ByteDAG Neural SDE runs a 63-layer forward pass, computing neural SDE dynamics, gauge field geometry, and regime classification.

Step 4

Signal Output + Hash

Classified signals are written to ClickHouse and hashed to a SHA-256 chain — an internal integrity ledger. Public verification and external anchoring are on the roadmap, not yet live.

The DePIN layer runs on a live world-data estate

Kairos is not just a crypto API. Underneath sits a telemetry estate ingesting markets, weather, seismic activity, power grids, rail, marine and space weather around the clock — the context layer DePIN numbers get judged against. The figures below are queried live from the estate itself.

109Live sectors, last 24h
21.3MRows ingested, last 24h
8,518Distinct series, last 24h
9.36BRows held, all time

The world layer now watches physical infrastructure directly: 4,148 AIS-tracked vessels across 2 national receiver networks, 26 satellite constellations, 437 military aircraft airborne at the latest sweep, 122 active US airspace restrictions (TFRs), and 29 days of GPS-interference history — all measured 2026-08-24.

Refreshed live from the estate at page load (fallback figures measured 2026-08-24) — verify the raw response yourself at /v1/world.

Where every number comes from

Not all first-party — and we label which is which. Each source is named on every value, so you always know exactly what you're trusting.

First-Party Network Telemetry

Node counts, committed CPU/GPU, storage, leases, staking and coverage read straight from each network's own API and chain — including Akash Console, WeatherXM stations and Flux nodes. The deep-telemetry layer: 296 networks, 3,773 first-party series (as of 2026-08-27).

CoinGecko — Market Facts

Price, market cap, circulating / total / max supply and fully-diluted valuation for 379 networks (as of 2026-08-27). Every value's verify_url links to the exact CoinGecko coin page, so you can confirm it at the source.

DefiLlama — Revenue & TVL

Protocol fees (24h / 7d / 30d) and TVL read from DefiLlama's public endpoints, each linked back to the DefiLlama page or api.llama.fi so the figure is checkable upstream.

GitHub — Dev Activity

Repository signals such as stars and open issues, pulled from GitHub for the projects that publish them. A live read on developer momentum, attributed to the exact repo.

Honest Source Mix — provenance-stamped values & deep-telemetry series
CoinGecko · 6,388 DefiLlama · 220 First-party APIs & chains · 3,801 GitHub · 324 Akash Console · 165 Flux API · 11 WeatherXM · 2

Security

How signal integrity is ensured through cryptographic hashing and transparent logging.

Infrastructure
Access: Key-based authentication + 2FA Audit: All signal state changes logged to ClickHouse Infrastructure: Self-hosted on owned hardware

Every signal, prediction, and hash is logged to an append-only ClickHouse ledger (immutable MergeTree storage, internal — not externally anchored yet) for full auditability. Infrastructure is self-hosted with transparent logging.

Signal Integrity
SHA-256 Chain: H(i) = Hash( H(i-1) || State(i) ) Storage: ClickHouse columnar database Ledger: internal hash-chained signal records and counting

Every classified signal is hashed and chained, recording when each prediction was made and what was predicted, and making silent after-the-fact edits detectable internally. The chain records order and integrity — it does not establish that predictions were correct or profitable.

Three Products, One Stack

Kairos runs three products on one owned-hardware stack: a verifiable DePIN data API, statistical market signals from the ByteDAG Neural SDE, and GPU compute. The DePIN data is collected and provenance-stamped — it is measured telemetry, not model output.

Statistical Signal API

Access the 63-layer ByteDAG forward pass output for 47 crypto perpetual markets. Currently free while the model is in beta — we will not charge for this until it demonstrably beats free baselines out-of-sample.

DePIN Intelligence API

Live supply, revenue and market telemetry for 457 DePIN networks — 11,061 live series, 383 networks with first-party or chain-direct feeds, out of 800 cataloged (as of 2026-08-26). Every value carries source + as_of + a verify_url. API access on approval. Tiers: Design Partner $199/mo, Pro $499/mo, Enterprise $2,000+/mo.

Become a $199/mo Design Partner →

GPU Compute API

68+ models served via a single API, $0.002/1K input · $0.004/1K output tokens. Self-hosted on owned hardware with transparent logging.

Start Building →

What You Can Build

Three areas where the ByteDAG signal pipeline provides useful data.

DePIN Data

Crypto Market Signals

The ByteDAG Neural SDE generates directional signals for 47 crypto perpetual markets. Every signal is hashed into a SHA-256 chain in an internal integrity ledger; public verification and external anchoring are on the roadmap, not yet live.
  • 47 assets
  • 63-layer neural SDE forward pass
  • SHA-256 hash-chained signal ledger (internal)
DePIN

DePIN Data Analysis

Public blockchain telemetry from Helium, DIMO, and Hivemapper (public data, not operated by us) cross-referenced with other data sources for infrastructure analysis.

  • Helium, DIMO, Hivemapper public data
  • Node telemetry correlation analysis
  • Geographic coverage mapping
Insurance

DePIN Provenance & Trust

Every value in the DePIN API carries source + as_of + a public verify-yourself URL. Where a network publishes no free feed, it's named as such — no invented numbers. The clean-epoch audit deleted fabricated series — only post-2026-08-06 data ships.

  • 457 networks + 129 subnets · 11,061 provenance-stamped live series
  • Per-metric provenance on every field
  • Clean-epoch: fabricated series deleted, not shipped
Get Started — Free Tier Available →

Sample API Response

Every API response includes signal metadata and a SHA-256 chain hash. The block below is an illustrative response shape with example values — not live output; the confidence field is a placeholder and no confidence figure is validated out-of-sample.

GET /api/v2/signal/latest · illustrative
{
  "signal_id": "sig_2026_06_27_1200_az",
  "timestamp": "2026-06-27T12:00:04Z",
  "dag_layers_traversed": 63,
  "state_dim": 256,
  "classification": "TREND_BULL",
  "confidence": 0.NN,  // illustrative placeholder — not a validated figure
  "asset": "BTC/USD",
  "direction": "LONG",
  "sha256_chain": "a1b2c3d4...",
  "provenance": {
    "dag_layers": 63,
    "manifold_dim": 32,
  }
}

What You Get

SHA-256 Chain

Every signal links to the previous via SHA-256. Tamper-evident internally (append-only, hash-chained) — not externally anchored yet; public verification is on the roadmap.

Full 63-Layer Traversal

All 63 layers fire on every request. Full forward pass. No shortcuts.

Provenance Metadata

Every response carries signal metadata: 63 DAG layers, 256D manifold state.

Free API Access

Free tier only while in beta — full access to the same 63-layer engine.

The Stack

Each component serves a specific purpose in the pipeline.

Sources
Go Ingest
ClickHouse
Engines
API

ClickHouse

Columnar database for high-throughput ingestion. 9.1 billion market ticks. Every signal, prediction, and hash — queryable in milliseconds.

XGBoost Veto Gate

Gradient-boosted classifier trained on millions of market state embeddings. Acts as the final signal quality gate before emission.

PyTorch + NumPy + SciPy

The 63-layer ByteDAG runs in PyTorch with NumPy/SciPy for matrix exponentials. Neural SDE integrators drive the forward pass.

Go Ingestion Pipeline

High-throughput Go pipeline for data ingestion. Lockless architecture for maximum throughput.

Independent. Self-Funded.

Kairos Signal is independently built and self-funded, zero VC. The DePIN intelligence layer — 457 live symbols across 328 networks plus 129 Bittensor subnets, read from first-party APIs, market and revenue aggregators — the ClickHouse telemetry engine, and every data pipeline are built from scratch on self-owned infrastructure.

Every dollar of revenue goes back into the pipeline. Every signal is hashed. Every prediction is time-stamped in the internal hash-chain. This is a machine learning research product — not an investment advisor, not a broker-dealer.

The math is real. Every prediction is hashed into a SHA-256 chain in ClickHouse — an internal integrity ledger that records when a prediction was made and what was predicted, and makes silent after-the-fact edits detectable internally. It does not establish that predictions were correct or profitable; no performance is claimed, and prior backtest figures were withdrawn as non-reproducible. Public verification and external anchoring are on the roadmap, not yet live.

$0
VC Funding Taken
11,061
Provenance-Stamped Live Series
457
DePIN Networks Tracked
100%
Independently Owned

Get Started

Request API access — approved developers and agents pull provenance-stamped DePIN data where every value carries a verify_url you can check upstream, backed by a daily Bitcoin anchor. DePIN Intelligence tiers: Design Partner $199/mo, Pro $499/mo, Enterprise $2,000+/mo.

Become a Design Partner — $199/mo → Create Free Account →

The Math

The 63-layer architecture draws on established techniques in stochastic calculus, gauge theory, and topological data analysis. Every signal is cryptographically chained via SHA-256.

§1 — Topological Data Analysis & Persistent Homology

Stable multiscale summaries of the telemetry state geometry, used as candidate regime features. Any link to a proprietary transition is an empirical model result — not a consequence of persistence theory alone.

[1] Carlsson, G. (2009). Topology and Data. Bulletin of the AMS.
[2] Edelsbrunner, H. & Harer, J. (2010). Computational Topology: An Introduction. AMS.
[3] Zomorodian, A. & Carlsson, G. (2005). Computing Persistent Homology. Discrete & Comp. Geom.
[4] Bubenik, P. (2015). Statistical Topological Data Analysis Using Persistence Landscapes. JMLR.
[5] Ghrist, R. (2008). Barcodes: The persistent topology of data. Bulletin of the AMS.
[6] Cohen-Steiner, D., Edelsbrunner, H. & Harer, J. (2007). Stability of Persistence Diagrams. Discrete & Comp. Geom.

§2 — Neural SDE & Stochastic Dynamics

The drift architecture is informed by Hamiltonian mechanics; its continuous-time formulation is modeled as a Neural SDE. Whether symplectic or port-Hamiltonian structure is preserved depends on the specific parameterization and integrator — it is not automatic.

[7] Arnold, V. I. (1989). Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics. Springer.
[8] Marsden, J. E. & Ratiu, T. S. (1999). Introduction to Mechanics and Symmetry. Springer.
[9] Di Persio, L., Ehrhardt, M. & Outaleb, Y. (2026). Stochastic Port-Hamiltonian Neural Networks: Universal Approximation with Passivity Guarantees. arXiv:2603.10078
[10] Tzen, B. & Raginsky, M. (2019). Neural Stochastic Differential Equations: Deep Latent Gaussian Models in the Diffusion Limit. arXiv:1905.09883
[11] Greydanus, S., Dzamba, M. & Yosinski, J. (2019). Hamiltonian Neural Networks. NeurIPS.
[12] Chen, R. T. Q., Rubanova, Y., Bettencourt, J. & Duvenaud, D. (2018). Neural Ordinary Differential Equations. NeurIPS. arXiv:1806.07366
[13] Li, X., Wong, T.-K. L., Chen, R. T. Q. & Duvenaud, D. (2020). Scalable Gradients for Stochastic Differential Equations. AISTATS. arXiv:2001.01328
[14] Kidger, P., Foster, J., Li, X. & Lyons, T. (2021). Neural SDEs as Infinite-Dimensional GANs. ICML. arXiv:2102.03657
[48] Milstein, G. N., Repin, Yu. M. & Tretyakov, M. V. (2002). Symplectic Integration of Hamiltonian Systems with Additive Noise. SIAM J. Numer. Anal.

§3 — Empirical Functional Decomposition & Dependence-Aware Attribution

Under correlated inputs the engine computes an exact empirical least-squares projection onto a selected dictionary, then allocates interaction effects. Sensitivity decomposition is not causal identification, and the allocation is not conditional SHAP unless the cooperative game is stated explicitly — the references below bound each claim.

[15] Pearl, J. (2009). Causality. 2nd Ed. Cambridge.
[16] Hooker, G. (2004). Discovering Additive Structure in Black Box Functions. KDD.
[17] Sobol, I. M. (2001). Global Sensitivity Indices for Nonlinear Mathematical Models and Their Monte Carlo Estimates. Math. & Comp. in Simulation.
[18] Spirtes, P., Glymour, C. & Scheines, R. (2000). Causation, Prediction, and Search. MIT Press.
[19] Peters, J., Janzing, D. & Schölkopf, B. (2017). Elements of Causal Inference. MIT Press.
[20] Owen, A. B. (2013). Variance Components and Generalized Sobol' Indices. SIAM/ASA J. Uncert. Quant.
[49] Chastaing, G., Gamboa, F. & Prieur, C. (2012). Generalized Hoeffding-Sobol Decomposition for Dependent Variables. Electron. J. Statist.
[50] Owen, A. B. (2014). Sobol' Indices and Shapley Value. SIAM/ASA J. Uncert. Quant.
[51] Song, E., Nelson, B. L. & Staum, J. (2016). Shapley Effects for Global Sensitivity Analysis: Theory and Computation. SIAM/ASA J. Uncert. Quant.
[52] Harbrecht, H., Peters, M. & Schneider, R. (2012). On the Low-Rank Approximation by the Pivoted Cholesky Decomposition. Appl. Numer. Math.

§4 — Chaos Theory & Dynamical Systems

Delay-coordinate reconstruction and local-instability (Lyapunov) estimates used as regime diagnostics. A positive exponent in noisy, nonstationary market data is a diagnostic — not proof of a deterministic attractor; surrogate-data and embedding checks are required.

[21] Takens, F. (1981). Detecting Strange Attractors in Turbulence. Dynamical Systems and Turbulence, Warwick 1980, LNM 898, Springer.
[22] Eckmann, J.-P. & Ruelle, D. (1985). Ergodic Theory of Chaos and Strange Attractors. Rev. Mod. Phys.
[23] Wolf, A., Swift, J. B., Swinney, H. L. & Vastano, J. A. (1985). Determining Lyapunov Exponents from a Time Series. Physica D.
[24] Kantz, H. & Schreiber, T. (2004). Nonlinear Time Series Analysis. Cambridge.
[25] Packard, N. H., Crutchfield, J. P., Farmer, J. D. & Shaw, R. S. (1980). Geometry from a Time Series. Phys. Rev. Lett.

§5 — Non-Markovian Dynamics & Rough Path Theory

Rough-path and fractional models for non-Markovian structure. Roughness (low Hurst, H<½) and long-range memory (typically H>½) are distinct — and non-Markovian structure does not by itself imply persistent directional alpha.

[26] Mandelbrot, B. B. & Van Ness, J. W. (1968). Fractional Brownian Motions, Fractional Noises and Applications. SIAM Review.
[27] Lyons, T. (1998). Differential equations driven by rough signals. Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana.
[28] Friz, P. K. & Hairer, M. (2014). A Course on Rough Paths: With an Introduction to Regularity Structures. Springer.
[29] Gatheral, J., Jaisson, T. & Rosenbaum, M. (2018). Volatility is Rough. Quantitative Finance.
[30] Biagini, F., Hu, Y., Øksendal, B. & Zhang, T. (2008). Stochastic Calculus for Fractional Brownian Motion and Applications. Springer.

§6 — Geometric Loop Features Inspired by Gauge Theory

Holonomy-style geometric features over the asset covariance manifold, inspired by gauge theory. The correspondence to executable mispricing is a modeling analogy — not a theorem from the cited physics literature.

[31] Yang, C. N. & Mills, R. L. (1954). Conservation of Isotopic Spin and Isotopic Gauge Invariance. Physical Review.
[32] Connes, A. (1994). Noncommutative Geometry. Academic Press.
[33] Baez, J. C. & Muniain, J. P. (1994). Gauge Fields, Knots and Gravity. World Scientific.
[34] Witten, E. (1989). Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial. Commun. Math. Phys.
[35] Donaldson, S. K. (1983). An Application of Gauge Theory to Four-Dimensional Topology. J. Diff. Geom.

§7 — Subdifferential Mechanics & Non-Smooth Optimization

Generalized-gradient methods for optimization at non-differentiable points (locally Lipschitz functions). Modeling genuine market jumps additionally requires jump-diffusion, change-point, or regime-switching structure — the subdifferential handles kinks, not arbitrary discontinuities.

[36] Clarke, F. H. (1990). Optimization and Nonsmooth Analysis. SIAM.
[37] Rockafellar, R. T. (1970). Convex Analysis. Princeton.
[38] Moreau, J. J. (1962). Fonctions convexes duales et points proximaux dans un espace hilbertien. Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci.
[39] Shor, N. Z. (1985). Minimization Methods for Non-Differentiable Functions. Springer (Consultants Bureau transl.).
[40] Nesterov, Y. (2018). Lectures on Convex Optimization. Springer.

§8 — Stochastic Calculus & Measure Theory

Foundations for the stochastic forward pass and scoring. PSD of the Gram matrix Γ = ΦᵀΦ/M follows directly from vᵀΓv = ‖Φv‖²/M ≥ 0 — a linear-algebra fact certified by Cholesky, not by any single classical reference below.

[41] Risken, H. (1989). The Fokker-Planck Equation. Springer.
[42] Doléans-Dade, C. (1970). Quelques applications de la formule de changement de variables pour les semimartingales. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie verw. Geb. 16, 181–194.
[43] Choquet, G. (1954). Theory of Capacities. Annales de l'Institut Fourier.
[44] Carathéodory, C. (1911). Über den Variabilitätsbereich der Fourierschen Konstanten. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo. (Toeplitz/positivity background — not the PSD certificate itself.)
[45] Øksendal, B. (2003). Stochastic Differential Equations. Springer.
[46] Karatzas, I. & Shreve, S. E. (1991). Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus. Springer.
[47] Ruelle, D. (1989). Statistical Mechanics: Rigorous Results. World Scientific.

63-layer architecture · SHA-256 signal chain

Read the papers. Verify the hash chain. Public technical manual → · Customer API reference →

Also available via Tor: wsxmqwmnqfpml6zhwexa544tk24ybcm3mh3oepexsqumhftwnuvdidyd.onion

Featured on Fazier

DePIN Intelligence Resources:

DePIN Intelligence DePIN Data API DePIN Supply Data Live Data Technical Manual API Reference Design Partner Blog