DePIN revenue & fees — 30 day

Generated 2026-10-05T03:58:05Z

Why this is two tables and not one. Fees are what users pay. Revenue is what the protocol keeps. A network can lead on one and be absent from the other, so merging them into a single “revenue” ranking would be a category error. Coverage differs too: fees are observable for 18 networks, the fee/revenue split for only 8.

Ranked by 30-day fees — what users paid

18 networks

#Network30d feesNative field As of
1ATH$4,374,095DL_FEES_30D_USD2026-10-05 03:31:33
2GEOD$926,611REV_30D2026-10-05 03:16:27
3AKT$276,604REV_30D2026-10-05 03:16:27
4RNDR$248,767REV_30D2026-10-05 03:16:27
5FIL$74,128REV_30D2026-10-05 03:16:27
6LPT$38,247REV_30D2026-10-05 03:16:27
7OPEN$34,268DL_FEES_30D_USD2026-10-05 03:31:33
8AR$28,727REV_30D2026-10-05 03:16:27
9CHUTES$19,684DL_FEES_30D_USD2026-10-05 03:31:33
10GRT$19,605REV_30D2026-10-05 03:16:27
11NODE$6,800DL_FEES_30D_USD2026-10-05 03:31:33
12AUKI$3,314DL_FEES_30D_USD2026-10-05 03:31:33
13WAL$3,144DL_FEES_30D_USD2026-10-05 03:31:33
14HOPR$1,620DL_FEES_30D_USD2026-10-05 03:31:33
15FLOCK$232DL_FEES_30D_USD2026-10-05 03:31:33
16XCH$64DL_FEES_30D_USD2026-10-05 03:31:33
17PEAQ$1DL_FEES_30D_USD2026-10-05 03:31:33
18HONEY$0REV_30D2026-10-05 03:16:27

Ranked by 30-day protocol revenue — what the protocol kept

8 networks

#Network30d revenueNative field As of
1ATH$874,819DL_REV_30D_USD2026-10-05 03:31:33
2OPEN$34,268DL_REV_30D_USD2026-10-05 03:31:33
3CHUTES$19,684DL_REV_30D_USD2026-10-05 03:31:33
4NODE$6,800DL_REV_30D_USD2026-10-05 03:31:33
5AUKI$3,314DL_REV_30D_USD2026-10-05 03:31:33
6WAL$3,144DL_REV_30D_USD2026-10-05 03:31:33
7HOPR$1,620DL_REV_30D_USD2026-10-05 03:31:33
8FLOCK$232DL_REV_30D_USD2026-10-05 03:31:33

Take rate — where the split is actually observable

Network30d fees30d revenue Retained
ATH$4,374,095$874,81920.0%
Refused: the take-rate league table. For 7 of the 8 networks carrying both fields, the fees and revenue figures are identical to the cent (OPEN, CHUTES, NODE, AUKI, WAL, HOPR, FLOCK). An upstream source emitting the same number in both fields is far more consistent with the split not being modelled for that protocol than with the protocol retaining 100% of user payments. Publishing those as “100% take rate” would assert an economic fact we cannot observe, and would imply they are all identical to the one network where the split IS visible. So the table above lists only the observable case.

Lifetime figures — not comparable to the above

Reported by the network’s own API, cumulative since launch. Shown apart because dividing a lifetime total by a 30-day window produces a ratio that looks like a finding and is arithmetic.

#NetworkLifetime usage revenue Native fieldAs of
1GEOD
⚠ ANNUALISED RUN-RATE (ARR): GEODNET's own homepage renders this field as 'Current Annual Recurring Revenue'. NOT a window, NOT a cumulative lifetime total. Annualise DefiLlama's REV_30D before any comp
$10,645,511USAGE_REVENUE_USD2026-10-05 03:51:33

Capacity utilisation · Node health · All networks · Pricing · Measurement only; no predictive claim.